A Commentary Paper based on “Blood Diamond” and “An Incovenient Truth”
October 23rd, 2007 by serj* This paper was a result of trying to reach the requirement of making a 2,000- word commentary paper based on two films shown in the subject, Social Sciences and Philosophy 3, concerning the Behavioral Sciences. Guide Questions were given, leaving the writer in a state of "nosebleed". Moreover, his words weren’t enough to fill the prerequisite, so he turned to word blabbering. Thus, he ended up with a 2, 946-word paper.
* Grammatical errors are still evident in this paper.
* World Population, Birth Rate, and Death Rate Figures: www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world -factbook/geos/xx.htm
A wake-up call would be the proper way to describe “Blood Diamond” and “An Inconvenient Truth”, but these just prove that some of us have really linkages with monkeys. It is indeed true that there are differences amongst people, as shown on the films. And these may be our bases who are “closer” to the ape ancestry or just simply not!
A divine person is said to have created us, but science refuses to believe this by saying that humankind has been a product of evolution from a chain of “ape ancestry”— the Neanderthals, Australopithecus africanus, Homo erectus, and finally our taxonomic classification: the Homo sapiens. But still, pundits claim that there is a missing link, but later on said that, after finding “Lucy”, the connection between apes and us has been found. This is still under debate until now though as some still refuse to believe the possibility.
But now, what separates a man from an ape? Perhaps it is intelligence? Maybe it is their actions. Monkeys tend to be more careless than humans, and this is the reason why in these two films, men are comparable to apes.
But deviating away from that comparison a little, the two movies have also shown what type of society we have now because of the gross behavior of humanity: promoting gender discrimination, being slapdash to the environment, and contributing to the welfare of terrorists through stealing. Illegal and disappointing as they may be, but these are still true in society.
To understand this more, there is what we call Social Sciences, which according to Hunt and Collander (1999), is “a system of knowledge about the nature, growth, and functioning of human societies.” Moreover, it is “the field of human knowledge that deals with all aspects of group life.” There are also various areas to which a person can be subjected to be studied.
For example, Psychology can be used in understanding the minds of people. The trait of one person can either be innate or natural, or it has been nurtured by the society. Now, why would a person contribute to terrorists? Perhaps his family oriented him about the goals of these terrorists, and it has shaped his mind to help them. He might have the perception that terrorists are the unsung heroes of his land and only them could alleviate the crises. Is greediness and being a terrorist natural to man or is it nurtured? Well, it is said that man is naturally greedy, but this must be a fallacy for what made man greedy is not the genes that he inherited from his parents nor did he self-impose it on him for not much of a reason, rather it is the framework of society that has influenced him to be one. But man is naturally helpful; although it may be limited depending on the picture society has painted to how much help one should give to different types of people. He may help the terrorists big time by giving them all the support they need like money and shelter. But he may help the government too, but not like the one he has given the terrorists. He might give money, but it may not be tantamount to the one he gave his “unsung heroes”.
Now, why are people careless to the environment? Economics can enlighten us with this one, as it is the study made on the choices people make in everyday lives based on their needs. Because of these needs; people have adopted many inventions whether through diffusion or acculturation that have either helped the economy of a country or the other way around. Because of irresponsibility, thinking that throwing things around is okay and that resources are abundant, thus producing goods is not a problem, people learned to abuse without knowing the consequences. With increasing demand, more factories may be needed to supply the needs, thus increasing carbon dioxide emissions that deplete the ozone layer, leading to global warming. Now, man is more concerned to meet his needs that scarce resources are scarcer or nothing! Alternate resources do help, but these too may lead to another problem, or worse, world destruction.
And lastly, how about gender discrimination? How and why did it happen before and up until now? History informs us that past events can help us improve the status quo, or the present situation, because we are able to learn about them, and in order for bad things not to happen again, we can verify the mistakes once we have identified them, thus this field in social science can help us understand events and happenings that are occurring right before our very eyes. In the past, people were divided into groups, like forming a system like the Caste. People were categorized by how much wealth they have and by the power they exude. This gave birth to having slaves, a classification which deprived the people belonging to this group of comfort because not even all of their basic needs are met.
But then this later on evolved, as gender also became a distinguishing factor as well in grouping people, saying that men are more powerful than women. And since then on, women were imprisoned within the house as ordinary wives doing nothing but house chores and handicrafts. And this still persists now as some are still trapped into thinking that women are just subordinates to men and are not equivalent, although this grouping is now open, meaning that women can later on be equals to men once they have proven that they can also do what their counterparts can.
Other areas in Social Science are also be important in understanding our society namely Anthropology, Sociology, Geography, and Political Science.
In “Blood Diamond”, the society was depicted as what Leonardo DiCaprio said, “killing is a way of life.” People are not just enslaved, but maltreated and discriminated by color, and ethnicity. Families are torn apart by politics, and the continuous “production” of “blood diamonds”. Due to advancement in technology, crimes can be made a secret, leaving the innocent ones punished and the culprits unpunished.
This society is way much different in others, as diamond can only be found in chosen areas of the globe. But it does not differ much on the brutality that people in it experience due to dirty politicking. For example, here in the Philippines, seventy to ninety percent of those who are thrown into jail are innocent; leaving those supposed-to-be criminals, free to do more misdemeanors.
In “An Inconvenient Truth”, on the other hand, depicted society as being lackadaisical, which now faces the consequences of its actions— Global Warming. Because most are just concerned of becoming rich, they do not care how their production could affect Mother Earth. Because people are so engrossed of being globalized, they fail to take into consideration the vital role of the environment in the lives of mankind.
This does not differ much in societies found in different places, as the problem on global warming is a predicament of the humanity. It is, after all, due to our cumulative irresponsibleness to the environment since then.
Our society now, thus, is a product of the different societies or ‘ages’ that the world has undergone: the Stone Age, the Middle Ages, and the Renaissance, to name a few. Through these periods, the human race has undergone different developments coupled with predicaments. An example would be the case of Global Warming. But some injustices are still continued in societies today like racial prejudice. For example the “Diamond age”, the blacks were still made into slaves just to dig for diamonds, which can be bartered to acquire money. So why the blacks? It was because in history, there was bias based on color and race. Some were discriminated if he or she does not look like the rest. Moreover, blacks were also subjected to verbal attacks since people called them names, and also they were given no personal right, even by the government. This slavery later on led to progress, usually in a bad way, in some aspects. An example would be the blood diamonds that are used to fund terrorist activities.
In the past, meeting the needs of the many due to population explosion was an obstacle, but this was later on answered when machines were invented to provide a faster and more efficient production. But this too created a new predicament, as machines are now beginning to replace manpower since technology has also advanced. How can this be solved? How can people without jobs be helped? These are yet to be answered. But now, people are more concerned on how to get rich and richer.
Now through the course of time, by socialization, our situation has changed. The agents of socialization in various societies are influencing people both in good and bad ways. For example, the media can be bad by saying that “diamonds are a girl’s best friend.” Why? Because most people are not aware of where and how these diamonds are mined and they are more than willing to buy these at any price! But, most of these diamonds are illegal, as portrayed in the movie, “Blood Diamond”. Because of the money involved in mining diamonds, the riches one could get in return have blinded many. They do not care if they have to do it illegally by maltreating and enslaving people, and possibly kill them; violating their human rights. This can become the enzyme in catalyzing change within a society to become greedy. Due to the responses of the people, situations that should have been banned because of illegality have carried on.
But on the other hand, the agents of socialization within a society like the media, again, can be of good influence. An example would be the advocacy on the present issue of global warming. It informs the public that actions should be made to prevent further depletion of our ozone layer. The Internet, for example, has sites that cater to this advocacy, specifically the official domain of the award-winning documentary “An Inconvenient Truth”. In this site, tips were shared on how an ordinary human being can help in the worldwide effort to prevent global warming. This encourages people to pay it forward: to their schools, workplace, and etcetera, to which they have influence on and can incur change. With this, history can possibly be made!
Speaking of history, how can something be called “history” or “history-making”? We can define something as “history-making” when it has made an impact for a long time. In a smaller scale, we can use our cellular phones as an example of something that is “history-making”. With this gadget, communication has been made accessible to almost all and convenient to many. Moreover, the invention of cell phones has made business transactions fast and efficient, as calling someone to close a deal can now be easily made everywhere you are. In addition to that, almost anyone can now purchase a unit!
In a larger scale, due to the impact of money and technology, and even of the agents of socialization such as the family, school, media, workplace, and peer groups in the society, it has incurred change and this era is now definitely part of history!
In both movies, the society still stands in the brink of poverty, wherein the rich are getting richer and poor being poorer and more problematic! An example would be the case of those people initiating the hunt for blood diamonds in “Blood Diamond”. They are the only ones getting rich and not the slaves.
It also shows that society stands in a “fully developed industrial age”, where people now begin to realize the consequences of being industrialize, as shown in “An Inconvenient Truth”. Even with technology so advanced, humankind is still incapable of answering its problems. The next stage or era would probably be the miracle age, which shall cure the illness this society has caused.
The state of families, which are essential components of society, has also been depicted in both films, either directly or indirectly.
In the case of “An Inconvenient Truth”, it shows the effects of global warming not only to one family, but the group of families constituting a society. Strong storms, intense heat, and depleting resources, which means lack of food and water supply, are only few of the products global warming can slap in the faces of the members of each family. The family that is implicitly depicted here, as said in one of the previous paragraphs, are careless with their actions, unlike in the previous periods when families were more precautious, which are probably due to the drawbacks or restrictions imposed by the society in which they are moving.
On the other hand, “Blood Diamond” shows that there are still families at the verge of poverty and slavery. Although surveys have said that poverty is decreasing, it still cannot measure how slum the situation of some in other countries especially in Africa. It goes to show that some areas are still hopeless and that helping one is not enough when somewhere else, people are still suffering. Before, progress seems to be felt by each member of the society, but now, having the said film as basis, progress is only felt by some members of the society; only those who get richer!
Men and women in society, according to the movies, are still different, therefore, not equal like in one of the films, which is “Blood Diamond”, where it showed a caste system wherein females were subordinates to males and that ethnicity was a criterion if you should be treated well or not. For example, the women in the tribe of Solomon Vandy were killed, while most men whom they think who were capable of work were left to survive, therefore they became slaves. In addition to that, women are still prioritized to be well taken care of, while men do the battling. Danny Archer sent Maddy Bowen home. Women were always told to escape. Second, color was a big deal as the film showed a socially stratified time. An example was when Vandy was referred to a “white” when he did not find the name of his family on the list of refugees.
Also shown was that women were now allowed out. Meaning, they can work now, and can produce the same amount of pollution men can make. The films also show, especially “Blood Diamond”, that the children are very important to their parents and that a son is most likely to be close to his father because the said parent is the person whom he can identify with.
It is also shown that family had the greatest impact on socialization, especially in behavior. This was seen as Solomon was trying to win back his son from the RUF. But this particular part of the movie also shows that peer groups (RUF) can greatly influence a person (Solomon’s son). Aside from this, the RUF taught their ‘young radicals’, as if schooling while they were terrorizing the place. They have brainwashed the children.
What types of men and women can soon prevail in our society then after seeing these movies? It may be possible that women can now be used for battle, which is slowly becoming true right now, as women now enroll in military academies. Possibly, women may also penetrate the jobs only done by men, which is evident right now in society, thus, they can really be considered as equivalent to men.
For men, they may become more authoritative. Pride will forever linger within the soul of a man. He will still more likely be in control, if things were to be based by experience. But women can overshadow men now, and for them not to be “shadows”, men may soon penetrate the jobs only done by women too.
As said in one of the above paragraphs, history can help us make the future better, by verifying what has happened in the past. Possibly, these things that are happening in present time, as shown on both films, can help us find the key to help us alleviate the crises. The problem is, there are too much answers to problems that we end up receiving nothing but bulk. We do not receive direct answers, which could indeed help humanity.
Today, the world population is estimated to be 6,602,224,175 , which is composed of 3,323,608,139 males and 1,156,245,827 females. With 20.09 births per 1,000 population and only 8.37 deaths per 1,000 population, the carbon dioxide emissions are still going up, more forests are expected to be denuded, and nonrenewable sources of energy are close to zero. But the UN and APEC have already considered future goals and actions to hopefully eradicate the issue.
Aside from that, we still have a socially stratified society, with people still thinking that if you are Asian, you are not as good as the Americans and Europeans. If you are fat, you are not beautiful. If you do not have big breasts, you are not attractive. And the list goes on, but this is now an open caste, wherein people can “change their position” at will and if they have achieved the “requirement”. The problem is, most can still not progress due to some factors that hinder their development. How can this be solved? Well, by not trying to be monkeys can be a good start. In addition to that, by not being like crabs that pull one another when one has achieved success. Moreover, by choosing influences, man can probably nurture a society wherein discrimination would be a crime; thus, it will be nothing anymore, but history— a problem solved!